None of VTA’s Measure D arguments hold up.

Use the current Watchdog Committee?
VTA is already supposed to seek those members’ review and comment. VTA’s “Watchdog Committee” and its “Citizens Advisory Committee” are the same people!

Too costly?

VTA has three measures on this ballot. If VTA can afford three measures in one election, they can certainly afford one measure every six years. This measure removes voters’ right to have their say, and fails to add any new way for VTA to receive public input.

More effective process?

VTA’s proposed “new process” uses an existing, largely ignored advisory committee. A Grand Jury report and two outside audits have concluded that VTA often ignores the opinion of its advisory committees. VTA didn’t even tell the Watchdog Committee about this measure before they placed it on the ballot.

Is VTA interested in reform?

VTA refused to implement Grand Jury recommendations. VTA’s board did not discuss the 2007 MTC Triennial Audit, which raised concerns about VTA operations. The State Auditor wrote twice that “VTA misinterprets our report findings.”

Are watchdogs as effective as your vote?

Watchdogs have bark but no bite. They’re appointed and can be ignored by the VTA board. Watchdog comments are not the same as a public vote. VTA needs more sunshine, not less. Only the public has the clout to legally hold VTA accountable.

VTA’s plan defines how they will spend our money. Don’t give up your right to vote on it.

Vote NO on Measure D.

Martin B. Schulter
Member and Former Chair, 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee/VTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Stephen Blaylock
Member, 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee

Joyce Crick-Baker
Former Member, 1996 Measure B Citizens Watchdog Committee

Bruce Jenkins
Former Member, 1996 Measure B Citizens Watchdog Committee

Jim Stallman
Former Member, 1996 Measure B Citizens Watchdog Committee
Former President, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition